Paul S. Bains wrote: > Perhaps I misunderstood the poster - unused, uncompiled code cannot be > loaded into RAM, unless you editing it.
Yep. > Unused compiled code can, but > that is beyond the realm of the user. No, it's not. IIRC, this thread at some point of time was about setting USE flags. With USE flags, the user can control what gets compiled and what not. > If the developer has functions > that are not ever being used, then that's the developer's fault. Or the packagers, for not proving enought options of what gets installed. Alexander Skwar -- The nice thing about Windows is - It does not just crash, it displays a dialog box and lets you press 'OK' first. (Arno Schaefer's .sig) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
