-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alexander Skwar wrote: > So: Why use PAM on systems that fit to the scenario I laid > out?
Because, in the very near time, your configuration will be obsoleted by an upgrade, and probably stop working altogether. It's standard already, I guess. - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - www.buanzo.com.ar Consultor en Seguridad Informatica / Dominio Digital TV - Da FOSS man! KTP Consultores - info AT ktpconsultores.com.ar Romper un sistema de seguridad los acerca tanto a ser hackers como el encender autos puenteando los convierte en ingenieros automotrices. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDgGH+AlpOsGhXcE0RAs5/AJ4hY9PpTYM1CePQ1qGrI7lzpIDRdwCfdpag DnKV7qrWnNiNZ/tr0sHap3Q= =kMRR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
