-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Alexander Skwar wrote: > No, it won't, I'd think. But, why DO you think so?
Excessive parts of a working system are curretnly opt-dependant on PAM, but most also use PAM to get specific functionality they do not want to provide. It just a guess, but I'm sure this trend will get to parts of a minimal system, too, because of the minimalism required. Applications will provide auth functionality over PAM, in a centralized library, instead that providing that functionality on their own. Less size. Less complexity. More code-reusing. Just a guess. - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - www.buanzo.com.ar Consultor en Seguridad Informatica / Dominio Digital TV - Da FOSS man! KTP Consultores - info AT ktpconsultores.com.ar Romper un sistema de seguridad los acerca tanto a ser hackers como el encender autos puenteando los convierte en ingenieros automotrices. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDgHNVAlpOsGhXcE0RAj6RAJ9c6mPP0+qUFFrifh287/6vnR57PwCePsDF ytFxeZbcOpglnNoZ5luq40g= =MnfX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
