On Monday 20 January 2025 23:40:22 Greenwich Mean Time Alexis wrote:
> Peter Humphrey <pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk> writes:
> > On Wednesday 15 January 2025 11:50:02 Greenwich Mean Time I
> > 
> > wrote:
> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/948143
> > 
> > That bug now has a patch, which proposes to move from
> > sci-misc/boinc-7.24.1-r1 to -r2. The scale of the changes proposed seems
> > to me too big for such a minor revision bump, but more than that, it has
> > several diffs against separate files, and I'm not /au-fait/ enough with
> > patching to know what to do with them all.
> > 
> > Would anyone here like to have a go at it?
> 
> Well, as the person who submitted that patch, i'd like to comment
> on this.

--->8

> So:
> 
> * The move from -r1 to -r2 is required because a revision change
>   is required when there any changes to an ebuild, including to
>   Gentoo-provided files, that don't come from upstream. This in
>   turn requires a new ebuild file, which makes up a significant
>   amount of the patch.

You misunderstand. I'm saying that the version change should be bigger, not 
just from -r1 to -r2. Perhaps 7.24.2? 7.25?

> * There are small changes to the boinc.conf and boinc.init files,
>   which i consider to be the minimum required to address the
>   suggestions that were made.

OK.

>   Specifically:

--->8

> i find your post here quite odd, discouraging, and an example of
> why i'm increasingly disinclined to devote so much time to
> volunteer ICT work, - that i would instead be better served by
> increasing my other volunteer work in other areas, where my
> experience is of people's gratitude rather than of
> entitlement. Rather than being appreciative of someone
> volunteering to take on the work, and rather than asking
> clarifying questions on the bug itself about what you don't
> understand, you've written a post on a public list effectively
> dismissing my work, assuming that it's fundamentally wrong. Okay
> then.

Where on earth did you get that idea? I only said I couldn't see what to do, 
and asked for help with it.

-- 
Regards,
Peter.




Reply via email to