On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 2:41 PM n952162 <n952...@web.de> wrote:
>
> On 8/6/21 8:22 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 8:37 AM n952162 <n952...@web.de> wrote:
> >> I was complaining, mostly, that isodate had to be the thing that was
> >> incompatible with my configuration.  Maybe there is a unavoidable reason
> >> that that package had to move to the newest EAPI, or maybe it was just a
> >> sense that it's cool to be with the cutting edge.  It seems to me that
> >> isodate (which is actually tied, perhaps indirectly, to clearly slow
> >> United Nations rule-making) must be pretty stable.
> >>
> > ...
> > It might not hurt if that error message included the suggestion to run
> > "emerge -u portage" to update it. It does say that the solution is to
> > update portage - it just doesn't explicitly tell you how to do so.
>
>
> The way out of my dilema would be first to emerge portage and then
> emerge @world?

In this case that would probably fix it.  Some update issues can get
messy if you don't update often, but usually for EAPI issues you just
need to update portage itself.

-- 
Rich

Reply via email to