On 03/06/2014 19:08, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
> Who is "forcing"  anything? pm-utils has been unmaintained FOR FIVE
> YEARS. Any project that decides to stop using it is making just the
> right decision; UPower just did the correct thing. And systemd had
> *nothing* to do with it, except for providing a better, more reliable
> alternative.
> 
> That's what you and many others don't seem to understand: systemd is a
> *BETTER* implementation for basically *ALL* the hodgepodge of
> "solutions" that we had before in our plumbing layer.


<weak attempt to inject humour and lighten the thread mood>

This whole systemd thing looks awfully like the switch from a hosts file
to DNS so many years ago.

On the one had a hosts file worked and you could throw vi at it.
On the other hand this DNS thing could be evil and we'd have to hand
control over to <insert name of nebulous party here>.

Trouble is, a host file is an awful solution and really just does
everything badly. Much like shell init scripts.

We all, sysadmins and devs alike, agree that consistent interfaces are a
very good idea, so we pick a standard and stick with it. And yet,
strangely, there's so much resistance to doing just that with early user
space.

I'm not a systemd user, but I do find this whole thing quite funny :-)

</weak attempt to inject humour and lighten the thread mood>


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com


Reply via email to