On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Pandu Poluan <pa...@poluan.info> wrote: > > On Jul 8, 2013 1:05 AM, "Bruce Hill" <da...@happypenguincomputers.com> > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 12:07:51PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: >> > On 2013-07-06 8:12 AM, Bruce Hill <da...@happypenguincomputers.com> >> > wrote: >> > > NB: I only sell the best A/V software on the market, which hasn't >> > > missed a virus in the wild since it's inception. >> > >> > Not to start a flamewar on which is the best AV, but I'm curious which >> > one this is? >> >> http://www.eset.com/us/home/whyeset/compare/ > > Oh. My. Goodness! ESET! I *love* that piece of gold :-) > > In fact, I'm still having the glow from the satisfaction of successfully > convincing the management to replace the previous p.o.s. that goes by the > name of "SEP", with this wonderful antivirus. > > The first week, ESET unearthed more than 1'000 threats (throughout the > company) that SEP had turned a blind eye to. It's really a mystery how SEP > ever got crowned with any "Good" attributes. > > Granted, the "Business" version has much more options than one can shake a > stick at, but for control-happy BOFHs, ESET is a godsend, a breath of fresh > air compared to the CPU-guzzling ineffective p.o.s. called SEP. > > (sorry for the tangential offtopicness, I'm just so very glad to see a > fellow ESET-believer ;-) ). > > Rgds, > --
I love it as well, I even used their Linux-gateway scanner to scan network traffic. I know there are other free ways to do that, but ESET had impressed me enough by then. -- Alecks Gates
