Your user should be in plugdev, with the mountpoiny rwx by plugdev. I have root:plugdev rwxrwxr-x.
I have more written, but I'm travellong atm. Use app-pda/ideviceinstaller -l to get AppIds & then use ifuse --appid to mount Apps 'Documents' folders (to pass them music/videos/ebooks). I needed ifuse & libimobiledevice from git for my updated ipad1. On Nov 13, 2011 5:06 a.m., "Mark Knecht" <markkne...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:14 PM, James Broadhead > <jamesbroadh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As for native support, it looks as though Apple have updated their > > protocol, so if you've a new i*, or have updated recently, then the > > in-portage versions of ifuse and libimobiledevice won't work - I've > > just gotten my updated iPad working with current git versions of both > > however. > > > > I've also been working on: > > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Apple_ipod,_ipad,_iphone > > > > Please feel free to add to it. :) > > > > J > > Hi James, > Sitting here this evening I remembered you had posted this so I > thought I'd give it a try. While there's a lot of life I still don't > have a connection. Here's what I see following along with your > commands: > > 1) idevice_id just prints a help list. However > > idevice_id -l > > does give me a serial number. > > 2) ideviceinfo prints lots of information from the ipod. > > 3) idevicepair pair & idevicepair validate report success. Great so far. > > 5) ifuse /mnt/ipod does mount the ipod. I can cd to /mnt/ipod and see > directories, etc. > > k2 ipod # ls -la > total 4 > drwxr-xr-x 0 root root 204 Dec 31 1969 . > drwxr-xr-x 9 root root 4096 Nov 4 17:50 .. > drwxr-xr-x 0 root root 102 Dec 31 1969 DCIM > drwxr-xr-x 0 root root 102 Dec 31 1969 Downloads > -rw-r--r-- 0 root root 0 Dec 31 1969 com.apple.itunes.lock_sync > drwxr-xr-x 0 root root 204 Dec 31 1969 iTunes_Control > k2 ipod # > > At this point I start gtkpod but cannot find the ipod. I'm wondering > what root might need to do to make /mnt/ipod visible to my user > account? Should I be adding my id to some groups possibly? Something > else? > > Thanks for the write-up. > > - Mark > >
