On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Am Mittwoch 09 November 2011, 10:22:42 schrieb Mark Knecht: >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann >> >> <volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> > Am Montag 07 November 2011, 10:28:41 schrieb J. Roeleveld: >> >> On Sun, November 6, 2011 6:49 pm, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> >> > Am Samstag 05 November 2011, 20:45:15 schrieb Joost Roeleveld: >> >> >> Virtualbox has decent USB-pass-through support. Even quite high >> >> >> performance. >> >> >> >> >> >> > Thanks for your help. I do appreciate it >> >> > >> >> > virtualbox is also pretty broken at the moment. >> >> >> >> Broken in what way? >> >> I am happily using it without any issues. >> > >> > the worst way: >> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTk5Mw >> >> Yeah, it was sort of fun to watch that thread as it occurred on LKML. >> >> Personally I felt the Phoronix article was a bit of a troll as the >> best he could do personally was say that he had problems a year ago, >> but I believe the kernel devs are telling the truth as best they know >> it about the number of bug reports they get. Let's remember however >> that they probably don't here much from those of us who use it >> successfully. >> >> What I'm not clear about Volker is whether _you_ are a user of >> Virtualbox and have had problems with recent versions yourself or just >> down on the application because of what you read? >> >> - Mark > > except random crahes here and there and two instances of a virtual machine > deconstructing itself, no, no problems here. >
OK, good information, although I'm sorry you had the problems. - Mark
