On Monday, 19. September 2011 19:43:50 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > Am Montag 19 September 2011, 19:25:28 schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer: > > On Monday, 19. September 2011 18:36:18 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > Am Montag 19 September 2011, 16:41:08 schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer: > > > > On Monday, 19. September 2011 16:22:31 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:30:41 +0200 > > > > > > > > > > Nicolas Sebrecht <nsebre...@piing.fr> wrote: > > > > > > The 17/09/11, pk wrote: > > > > > > > dbus is installed in my system, but only because I > > > > > > > run > > > > > > > Xfce4 > > > > > > > (I > > > > > > > am > > > > > > > thinking of installing something else due to it's > > > > > > > becoming > > > > > > > bloated > > > > > > > just like gnome). And I have "-dbus" in my global > > > > > > > make.conf. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PS. I am quite astonished at the fact that I have a > > > > > > > computer > > > > > > > that is > > > > > > > _way_ faster than the first machine I installed > > > > > > > GNU/Linux > > > > > > > (an > > > > > > > Amiga > > > > > > > 4000 with a 68040 cpu at 40Mhz) on but the > > > > > > > "experience" > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > still > > > > > > > the same; it takes about the same time to boot, the > > > > > > > same > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > (or > > > > > > > even slower) to load a program. It seems the faster > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > computer > > > > > > > the more I have to wait for it to finish some task. > > > > > > > Contradictory, > > > > > > > no? Wonder why that is... (bloat?). > > > > > > > > > > > > Believe it or not but I bet you're not doing the same > > > > > > tasks > > > > > > with > > > > > > your > > > > > > modern machine and could just not run the user-end > > > > > > software > > > > > > you > > > > > > use > > > > > > today on a Amiga 4000 with a 68040 cpu at 40Mhz because > > > > > > they > > > > > > learn > > > > > > new > > > > > > feature since then. > > > > > : > > > > > :-) Example: > > > > > Try run a browser on that Amiga. I doubt it would even > > > > > manage to > > > > > display the Gentoo logo at http://www.gentoo.org. > > > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origyn_Web_Browser > > > > > > and I am sure that it will display pngs and jpegs with full colours > > > just fine. I am sure displaying 2 or 4 MP pictures will be working > > > great. Just > > > like the mpeg4 you are trying to watch. Or the ogv. > > > > I don't think so :) > > But it is a web-browser, that runs on classic amiga os and I really > > think, that it can display http://www.gentoo.org just fine. > > so can lynx. Does it make it usefull with todays internet? There are more > pages than just gentoo.org - The Sun for example or CNN or other high > quality sites.
Yes, I agree. You seem to miss the point of my post completely. Best, Michael
