On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <can...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Dan Johansson <dan.johans...@dmj.nu> wrote: >>> > This is definitely not a choice that the gentoo disto made; it is coming >>> > from several upstreams. >>> >>> I know it is from upstream but it still tastes really bad. ;-) >> >> I can only agree! >> I am having /usr on a LVM volume on all systems (Gentoo and non Gentoo). >> This will be a MAJOR issue if /usr needs to be on /. > > It is my understanding that /usr does *not* need to be on /, only that > if you do, you will need an initramfs. Look at > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/72275 and the thread > that followed it.
...and now I know that my entirely UUID-driven fstab may stop working, if they choose not to add that particular "tweak/improvement". -- :wq
