On Saturday 20 Aug 2011 09:57:46 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Sat 20 August 2011 03:48:18 Dale did opine thusly: > > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > On Sat 20 August 2011 02:17:06 Dale did opine thusly: > > >> It was discussed on -dev so far. This is the subject line: > > >> > > >> "Warn users not to do separate /usr partition without proper > > >> initramfs in the handbook?" > > >> > > >> I think it will apply to /var to at some point. I think it > > >> sucks. I have /var on a separate partition and want to put > > >> /usr on one to but not now. > > > > > > Eh? That's fucking braindead. It also violates everything udev > > > ever intended to do. > > > > > > /usr and /var on separate partitions, plus a custom kernel > > > without an initramfs is *exactly* the most common use case for > > > Gentoo.... > > > > I wish you could convince the devs of that. I already have /var on > > its own and was planning to put /usr on its own. I'm not now tho. > > Looks like /, /boot, /home and that's it for the OS part. It > > downright sucks. > > > > You planning to explain this to the devs? Maybe you will have > > better luck. They said it is a dev from Fedora that started this . > > . . . crap. ;-) > > I'll spend some time I don't have reading the archives, then see.
The very reason I use Gentoo is BECAUSE I don't like RHL. :( I still have to use CentOS on a server and curse every time it won't work like Gentoo. Can't they just leave us alone? -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
