On 06/05/2011 11:51 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 06/04/2011 02:59 PM, Indi wrote: >> Maybe I'll put the next person who complains about evolution on >> thunderbird and see how they do with it... > I absolutely love Thunderbird, but with one caveat... > > I love it because of its stability, how well it does IMAP, but most > importantly, how configurable it is, both through the use of extensions, > and manual edits to userChrome.css and user.js. > > I absolutely *loathe* the default U interface configuration. It took me > about a week to figure out how to get 3.1 to where I liked it and the > way I had had 2.x configured for ages... > > So, many people who may hate Thunderbird may just hate the default > config (like I did), and may not realize how easily it is customized, so > that they can have it 'their way'.
I see what you mean about the default config, LOL. Been trying to change the font sizes used for the message list and folder pane, but no success yet. Makes it a bit hard to see things but other than that it seems pretty nice once you remove the redundant folders it creates by default. It's much more responsive than the last version I tested, a huge improvement in fact. Just need to figure out what determines those list fonts -- it's in here somewhere... -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫
