On Saturday 04 Jun 2011 22:59:32 Indi wrote: > On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:44:30PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote: > > Am 04.06.2011 23:10, schrieb Indi: > > > Every single GUI MUA I ever tried would lock up and become unresponsive > > > at times when dealing with IMAP. > > > > I use Thunderbird and IMAP for 3 years now and in all that time became > > TB never unresponsive. So this point seems to have improved since your > > testing. > > That's good to know, thanks. > I'm unlikely to switch from mutt (due in part to so many macros and > customizations accumulated the last couple of years), but am always > keeping an eye out for those I support. > > Maybe I'll put the next person who complains about evolution on > thunderbird and see how they do with it...
When KDE4 came out I seriously thought of ditching KDE apps and Kmail is the one I use on a daily basis. I looked at other alternatives for a while and ended up coming back to Kmail, despite the need to install KDE4. Kmail version 1.13.7 is very stable for me and does more than what I need from a mail client. More importantly, it does things the way I expect them to do it. ;-) I have looked at mutt some time ago, but then I would also need to install fetchmail and smtp and what not, instead of a single desktop application. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
