Tero Grundström schreef:
>
>> In any case, I'm not having any problems with firefox or tbird 1.0.6-r1
>
>
> That's the real paradox here. I don't remember when was the last time I
> had a problem with ff (actually I use only Galeon these days, compiled
> against ff) so it feels so stupid to compile it just because of these
> revision bumps
No, you actually *did* have to upgrade to 1.0.6-- there was a GLSA for
1.0.5, for which 1.0.6 was the fix.
But what happened (or seems to have happened) is that some aspect of
this enterprise (either on the mozilla side or the gentoo side) was a
bit borked, requiring a revision, and then the revision had to be fixed.
Or the "error" was on both sides--from the changelog, it looks like
there was an error in the original 1.0.6 ebuild, requiring a revision to
1.0.6-r1, and then there was an upgrade to the source ("10MozillaFirefox
lib dir"), which required another revision to the ebuild.
The whole thing seems to have been a bit of a mess, but everybody seems
to have been a part of it.
Oh, well. Hope everything is straightened out now, except for the issue
raised in my post "Double Firefox folders in /usr/lib?".
So if that's a real issue, there could be another revision in all of our
futures. Sorry.
Holly
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
