On 03/20/2018 04:28 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 18-03-20 23:17:52, Michael Palimaka wrote: >> I see that in bug #650964[1] Council is pushing forward again with >> implementing user whitelisting on this mailing list (ie. anyone that is >> not "approved" will have their mail rejected). >> >> Could someone please explain how this doesn't directly contradict the >> core tenets of an open and inclusive community? >> >> 1: https://bugs.gentoo.org/650964 >> > While I personally do no agree with mailing list moderation infra has > been tasked with moving forward on it. In that vein, this is what we > are proposing. > > Install and configure mailman3/hyperkitty/postorius once they all > support python3. Specifically we wish to use docker-mailman for this so > we can easilly redeploy this on diferent machines as needed. > > mailman3 gives us two good things, it has support for moderation (for > better or worse) and it handles senders using dmarc. > > There are still some issues with it infra side (archiving will still > have to use the old system) and moving mailing lists is going to be fun, > but them the breaks.
Switching to mailman might have some good merits on its own, but as I understand it it isn't necessary for the proposal at hand, that can be solved using access control lists in mlmmj-process? -- Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
