W dniu pon, 04.12.2017 o godzinie 14∶18 +0100, użytkownik Dirkjan Ochtman napisał: > On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 10:43 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > On the face of it, I like this proposal. On the other hand, wouldn't it > > > > be > > > better if we just had more active list moderators? That is, moderators > > > > who > > > move problematic user's posts to moderated by default, and then withhold > > > the specific posts if necessary? > > > > I don't think this is really technically feasible. I don't know if mlmmj > > has the specific feature you're asking for, and even if it did, > > moderation with mlmmj is practically impossible to use. Even for low- > > traffic channel like gentoo-dev-announce@ it's not working well. > > > > Maybe we should move to a more modern list manager? I'm pretty sure mailman > can do this kind of stuff trivially. It feels bad if we have to institute > suboptimal processes due to crappy tooling, if better alternatives are > readily available. >
I'm all for it, as long as someone is actually going to do the necessary work within the next, say, 4 weeks. I'd really like to avoid once again having no resolution whatsoever just to wait for never-to-come upgrade. I should point out that this includes: 1. Switch to another mailing list software without breaking stuff. This needs someone from Infra really willing and being able to do it. 2. Establishing a clear policy on how moderation should be performed. Without a clear policy, the effects could be far worse than status quo. 3. Establishing a good and trusted moderators team. Normally I'd say ComRel could do that but given their inability to react within the last year... So, anyone volunteering to do the work? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
