Hi, Sam Jorna <wra...@gentoo.org> writes:
> Wouldn't it make more sense to make Gentoo *more* attractive to run in > corporate environments, rather than simply saying "We're not RHEL so why > bother"? > > People do use Gentoo in production environments, both personally and > professionally, even if it is those that have more investment in doing > so than the average IT Joe. By removing stable, we would be reducing the > potential arguments for the few who do want to use Gentoo in that sort > of environment. We would be becoming more of a niche distro. > > "Hey, lets try Gentoo - it's really configurable." > "What's their stable policy? How often does it break?" > "Stable? What's that?" I agree with Sam. I see several cases in academia (mainly astrophysics and particle physics) that Gentoo stable is used and performs well. Professtional use of Gentoo should be actively supported and even advocated. Benda
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
