On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 15:59 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 23:10:35 +1000 > "Sam Jorna (wraeth)" <wra...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On 28 July 2017 8:44:20 PM AEST, "Andreas K. Huettel" > > <dilfri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > That's not feasible. It would kill off any semi-professional or > > > professional > > > Gentoo use, where a minimum of stability is required. > > > > > > (Try keeping ~10 machines on stable running without automation. > > > That's already > > > quite some work. Now try the same with ~arch. Now imagine you're > > > talking about > > > 100 or 1000 machines.) > > > > And further, try proposing that to management - that you'll be > > managing hosts on a platform that has no "stable" to speak of. > > The professional/management argument is silly. Most avoid Gentoo. > Most companies, want to be able to pay for support. Not to mention > certifications and such for those they hire. None of which Gentoo has > regardless of stability. Not to mention reputation... > > Those that tend to run Gentoo have their own interest in such. I > have > seen many migrate from rather than to Gentoo. Large companies, who's > names we would all know. One of the few left is Meetup.com. They run > Gentoo as do some others. Seems Tivo does stuff with Gentoo, Google, > Sony, etc. Some tend to hire Gentoo devs... >
Seriously, can you please stop your diatribes. I am so absolutely fed up by your DoS'ing of the ML with your pointless points.
