Am Donnerstag, 23. März 2017, 10:51:01 CET schrieb Alexis Ballier: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 10:41:39 +0100 > > "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 21. März 2017, 11:24:39 CET schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: > > > So what's so special about your packages that you *need* a hack as > > > ugly as eblits? > > > > No response. Seems like there are no real arguments for eblits. > > I guess the argument is not for or against eblit but rather about "when > you want to change something you don't maintain, you have to justify it > properly"
No, the argument is about "we want to clean up the tree from abusive hacks". This is the same irrationality that still insisted on EAPI=0 when the entire profile tree was already requiring EAPI=5 support. -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)
