On 4/17/16 4:15 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 16-04-2016 21:05:56 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> Congratulations! You've just committed an invalid dependency that is >> going to cause true mayhem on every package using the eclass. > > I assume you've taken proper actions to mitigate this. > >> But why would anyone send patches for review, or even start wondering >> that we might be using USE=libressl all around for some reason... > > While I believe your point is right (patches for review), I think this > style of communication is unnecessary.
In case you haven't been following the other communications regarding the matter, the USE flag is not necessary here because ssl-cert.eclass does not involve any linking against openssl/libressl. So I'll be recommitting the original patch without the slot operator. The original patch is at https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/eclass/ssl-cert.eclass?id=7a4d6bd5fcb25d8381bc08e20ad6a5c1c80ad78f plus s/:0=/:0/ > > Thanks, > Fabian > -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : bluen...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
