On 4/16/16 3:18 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 4/16/16 3:16 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> >>> Congratulations! ... But why would anyone... >> >> Not really picking on you in particular, but this is not the first >> snarky comment on a commit we've seen today. >> >> If somebody makes a mistake, just point it out. I think we can all >> appreciate that glibc shouldn't break even in ~arch, and that libressl >> needs a USE flag due to the whole ABI situation. >> >> I can't remember the last time I just factually pointed out a mistake >> to somebody that they didn't just fix it. When there are real >> controversies then there are ways to escalate. We don't need to >> manufacture them out of accidents. >> > > I know it will cause rebuild but we are moving towards openssl:0= > dependency. Please look at the discussion on bug #569112. >
Sorry I originally thought mgorny was referring to the added slot operators, but he meant the USE flags. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : bluen...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
