On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>
>> And I don't really see the point in the libressl USE flag in this
>> case; I think that was only needed so the slot-operator would resolve
>> correctly.
>>
>
> Somebody else may be better informed, but I thought that there was a
> concern with having both libressl and openssl linked into two
> libraries that are in turn linked to by something else (causing a
> symbol collision), and the USE flag was necessary to switch between
> the two implementations since they aren't virtualized.
>
> If we've solved that problem in some other way then by all means say
> so.  However, I thought this was the main tradeoff in letting it use
> the same soname.

This eclass doesn't build/link anything. It just calls /usr/bin/openssl.

Reply via email to