> On Feb 17, 2016, at 9:01 AM, Ben Kohler <bkoh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Richard Yao <r...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> >> eudev has every commit scrutinized by people who care about using it on >> Gentoo. systemd-udev does not. Consequently, eudev has avoided the system >> boot breaking regressions that prompted its creation. That is a good reason >> to make it the new default. If it fails to fulfill its duties, then this >> could be revisited, but that should be unlikely. > I think if someone could enumerate those specific breakages and present it as > evidence, that could get more people on board for this change. Moreso than > just "upstream doesn't care about us" or "eventually split udev will be > impossible".
That would require more time than I have to give right now. Hopefully someone else could go through the old bug reports and IRC logs to find those records. > -Ben