On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 14:09:57 +0100 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chith...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Michał Górny schrieb: > >> In a follow-up, upstream wrote about how you should only run udev together > >> with systemd, and if you don't want to do that (spelling as in original): > >> > >> "we will not support the udev-on-netlink case anymore. I see three options: > >> a) fork things, b) live with systemd, c) if hate systemd that much, but > >> love udev so much, then implement an alternative userspace for kdbus to > >> do initialiuzation/policy/activation." > >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-May/019664.html > >> > >> So it seems a bit more than only initialization is needed. > > You're missing the third option which is a sane option, and jump > > straight to pitchforks. > > Are you serious? The quoted line directly above your comment shows > clearly that I have read and understood the third option. > > > If Lennart's single statement from 2014 is a reason to use eudev > > instead of systemd-udevd, my statement from today is a more important > > reason not to use eudev. > > With the exception that Lennart Poettering is the lead developer of > systemd/udev, while such a thing cannot be said about you and eudev. He's lead developer of *systemd*. udev is a split part of systemd codebase which has specific maintainers. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgpMpi_G7A2Pi.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
