On 02/09/2016 05:39 PM, Duncan wrote: > I'd agree, except that the way we're running udev is strongly discouraged > and generally not supported by upstream, with a statement that it /will/ > break in the future, it's simply a matter of time. > > Which makes a big difference when supporting that same specific use-case > is the primary and arguably only reason the considered alternative exists. > > IOW, it's not about not liking upstream. It's about choosing a default > that supports our default use-case. >
My point exactly. When this happens we either make something like eudev default or we have to make systemd default. I don't really care which as long as i still have the option to change it.
