On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:47:01 -0500
Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Brian Dolbec <dol...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 06:59:19 -0500
> > Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
  
> 
> It is a bit ironic that you chose this as the part to quote when
> adding a snide remark.  My whole point was that we shouldn't
> NEEDLESSLY drop old versions,  You seemed to have taken this as a
> complaint about dropping old versions when there is a valid reason for
> doing so.
> 
> Your tone here is anything but helpful.  My intent was really to
> contribute to the discussion constructively and point out a pain point
> for people running mixed-keywords.  Perhaps I didn't explain my point
> as well as I could have.  When somebody is saying something that
> doesn't seem sensible to you, it is usually better to assume that they
> just didn't make their point well than to assume that they don't have
> anything worth saying.
> 

Bravo.
Lemme think of an example of similar replies I have had to endure in
this style.
'Your logic / code makes no sense' (Well logical thinking is a tad beyond me 
yeah)

One will do. Other authors might recognise their closed minded retorts
and other such blunders.
What ever was so hard about politely prompting to please re-phrase, or,
more casually, run that by me again, or "I need you to re-state that",
or even plain 'huh'. Alternatively; wtf are you saying? (Love that one)

Let's consider the lack of virtues of leaping to the wrong
interpretation aka misunderstanding the data put, then jumping in head
first & retorting to the 'sender' with what amounts to a blatant
smack down. But, as the guides to use of irc tells us in the first
place; pure text, absent of the remainder of visual and auditory
metadata, offers a highly restricted context, highly prone to error.
aka, text on a screen. In other words, a disaster looking for a
location.

Oh and dol-sen don't feel you're being picked on. You of all
folk are NOT one to typically fall over this one. Wish it were
someone far more 'typical'. 

But I stray, NOT troll.
What were we talking about again?


-- 
kind regards

Ian Delaney

Reply via email to