-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 18/11/15 12:23, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > That sort of QA should take place before making a new Portage > relaese. I was talking about marking it stable, though. The problem we are talking about isn't making sure Portage's EAPI 6 support is bug free, but the pain caused by encouraging widespread use of features not available in the stabilised Portage.
> Quoting the devmanual: > > arch Both the package version and the ebuild are widely tested, > known to work and not have any serious issues on the indicated > platform. > > "Widely tested" has always meant tested on unstable users' > systems. Appealing to tradition or technical debt is not a strong way of convincing me. That you've been doing things wrong all along does not make for a good excuse to keep doing it wrong. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWTGB9AAoJENQqWdRUGk8BG0AQAN8cBbWyd00uW1puvZPlXJKj VdRZ2ejnt2HFX+XIROJuCQeRghHTRSEUFkGlyB4GeGkUoCjP3zmvADel/kV+7eB4 8Kir/HIlWEIaIN9szdH1vFP13AuHe8bS3Y+dFFb2GrQb6I8oIDCRSI3J1wZbztpO kyhwiJ2eNQaw+SbDbMHL4t8PomMkVpyv2Ix4y/K96e1gaGp9XGhT38YthxhnMBoy 9x8L6GHXyFnqnWYe/V549muENy2HwbAUGw9blBn/2R9U+DG4Ewc3PBEKPk75GFE3 kbl3T9xgeyWmuGRUn73aMUiluu0gvgNvwn5l9QT7po4n5wotOi76XBvewLPA+O7b jeu/3+n1iW75+x7n7T+Pn5uJ+9xffgTQcg7rcStYU6l+dpVEOXcnoptgyeJ6gY91 lhidelO1Wnk9x6VyxXNg4jfFphX19/H51xyfyFXxgj398Ex3kEZ3/X52mTGxuRJD 4h6LxkgDsZvWc6/GkmL8USWrUPAP8i2ncjTEabixXzbZCjG4DzN6nJoC6m/8aLyT MOoytIwc+evBUyBAKZ19f4m86FC1dcd5V7dGqGnR/tPWjc6xbx5f+iZk88/yKexO mXnr3K9f3uzFH2vXFGuHgiq8xPKNEV2ToYUL+M5bG1y4ZxbUiWmIzadI/t5pVPFK 7mn8r8x1ZWhNvCzzduF7 =9smD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
