On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:05:26 +0100 Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On 18/11/15 08:25, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> - If you mix stable and unstable then you are by definition an > >> advanced user, who will be able to cope with the situation. :) > Only that there is no real difference to the existing situation when > mixing stable and unstable. It is not guaranteed that all dependencies > of an unstable package are stable, so already now users may have to > accept the ~ keyword for dependencies in some cases. Similarly, such > users may have to accept EAPI 6 for some dependencies, which implies > that they install a package manager supporting EAPI 6. When ~ keywording is needed for dependencies, the PM's output makes it clear what's needed. In cases where EAPI 6 is needed for dependencies but the PM is unaware of EAPI 6, will there be good clues in the PM's output that the PM itself needs to be ~ keyworded?
