On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 14:25:28 +0200 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 10/10/2015 02:24 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > On 10-10-2015 14:19:44 +0200, hasufell wrote: > >>> +RDEPEND=" > >>> + !libressl? ( dev-libs/openssl:0 ) > >>> + libressl? ( dev-libs/libressl ) > >>> + sys-libs/zlib > >>> + net-libs/http-parser > >> > >> Please order deps alphabetically (I know I added libressl without > >> reordering, but that was just to keep the diff as small as > >> possible). > > > > Is this a policy > > It is undocumented policy. It is useless style nitpick. Go maintain the whole tree if you want your style to be the only true one :) Sometimes it is indeed better to sort alphabetically, sometimes upstream's configure.ac/CMakeLists.txt/whatever ordering is better. Whatever minimizes chances of missing a dep change on version bump and accommodates best maintainer is policy...
