William Hubbs: > I'm picking a random msg to reply to. > > My concern about doing a revbump just because the deps change is that > the new revision has to be committed in ~arch, so we then have to hit > the arch teams, which we know are overworked anyway, with stable > requests just because we changed the dependencies. Isn't that causing a > lot of possibly unnecessary work for our arch teams? >
Procedure over logic? Just commit it straight to arch if repoman doesn't complain.
