On 21/07/14 23:56, Michał Górny wrote: > Now... whether dynamic deps are technically the right thing to do is another > question. It merits discussion, but we need to be really sure about the > consequences of any change. > Yes, it does. I'm not sure if it leads anywhere, though. Dynamic deps > are a pipe dream. You can't implement them properly, so we're using > half-working implementation as an excuse to be lazy.
What's lazy is maintainer doing revision bump without thinking if it's really required, spreading his laziness upon every users machine (by triggering revision bump driven rebuild)
