On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 15:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Martin Vaeth <mar...@mvath.de> wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Martin Vaeth <mar...@mvath.de> wrote: > > The problems are of a different kind. Static dependencies don't do > > something that you want them to do. Dynamic dependencies are > > outright broken. > > Please, stop your childish behaviour. > You prove nothing be repeating claims which had just been disproved.
Let's start with the easiest issue: please point us all to the place where you "proved" how dynamic dependencies still work in the face of ebuild removals. Your solution to this problem will be of great benefit to all of us. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
