On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 21:01:02 +0300 Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On 09/07/14 18:35, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > > В письме от Вт, 8 июля 2014 18:22:50 пользователь Samuli Suominen > > написал: > >> It seems to me like people aren't making the effort of joining to > >> the team and meeting the high quality > >> ebuild syntax they've kept up... > > Samuli! With all my respect to you personally, please, don't tell > > anything about "high quality" of ebuilds syntax by the games team. > > Please. > > > > There are open bugs (non-ebuild bugs), sure > There are sometimes wrong dependencies in old binary-only games which > require special CD-ROM or other distfile, because that's > when we rely upon users to report the dependencies > > But, the ebuild syntax is good as it's in eg. base-system, toolchain > And games ebuilds are nice examples for people learning to write > ebuilds > > So, don't know what you are referring to... The coin has two sides; while you may shine a good light on the ebuilds in the Portage tree, it may shine a bad light on those in game overlays as I think this comparison was made somewhere earlier in this thread. From what I know, people appreciate those game overlays; so, while I'm not suggesting that you do shine such light, I'd just like to ask like mva for everyone to stop making such comparisons and/or quality checks. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
