Joshua Kinard: > Provide a technical counter-argument to that or propose a solution that > people can agree on and you're going to find people are a LOT more willing > to stand with you on fixing the perceived problem. >
I start to think here is some confusion going on. We already proposed solutions and there was no agreement. There are no more possibilities, except rewriting crossdev, doing non-trivial hackery on toolchain eclasses or stashing the whole multilib idea. There were some ideas about a few make.profile hacks, but they didn't happen either. I reopened this thread to make clear that we need to at least communicate this problem to the user and I proposed more ways than just hardmasking. Also, I am not going to work on solutions that have no agreement whatsoever. It does not make sense. So, I have no idea what you expect me to do that did not already happen.
