Joshua Kinard: > > "upstream" didn't say anywhere in that bug that they weren't interested. > They countered your reasoning with a technical argument. QA even states > that you need to file separate bugs for the various build failures. You > could set up a master TRACKER bug for these crossdev-related issues, and > then link in any existing bugs or create new ones tied to it, and that way, > you have things documented. >
I appreciate that you want to help, but I'm not sure how many times I have to explain to you that the PATH idea was neglected by the embedded gentoo project lead. Check the history of this thread, it starts here: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/linux.gentoo.dev/KZykx1DAJyM/YCMVUt4CzjUJ So again, I am not doing work that goes diametral to what the project lead wants and I am not going to fork crossdev. I have proposed numerous ways to communicate this problem to the user without touching any of the precious toolchain/embedded packages. If no one responds there, I'll just pick one and apply it.
