Dnia 2014-03-13, o godz. 07:59:55 Patrick Lauer <patr...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> On 03/13/2014 12:52 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > > >>> No, I don't think gentoo-functions should take over the symbolic > >>> link in /etc/init.d/functions.sh; that needs to stay with OpenRc. > >>> My plan there is to work that into a script that prints a warning > >>> message. It will stay that way until openrc-1.0. OpenRc upstream > >>> uses semantic versioning [2]. This means that as long as we are at > >>> 0.x we have to keep things backward compatible. > >>> > >> > >> ...why not? As you've said yourself, nothing related to openrc uses > >> /etc/init.d/functions.sh; if everything else in the tree is going to > >> use the new gentoo-functions "lib", why wouldn't custom end-user > >> scripts too? > >> > >> (again, scanned the bug, didn't see anything relevant to this) > > > > The relevance is that /etc/init.d/functions.sh is currently part of > > OpenRc's public API, and semantic versioning has a very specific > > description of how to deprecate functionality. > > Why deprecate it? > > I'm getting really irritated with the current trend of randomly renaming > and movearounding things. All it does is confuse people, break existing > setups and make documentation splitbrained (now you need to document two > things, and half the old docs won't be aware of it ...) See: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/3357 -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
