>>>>> On Thu, 2 Jan 2014, Ryan Hill wrote: > In case it's helpful here's what FOSSology[1] has to say about some > common packages that people have uploaded to their demo server.
I don't get your point here. The licenses of a package have to be checked in any case. Why would it be more complicated to check the full set of files in the tarball, instead of the subset of files that the package will actually install? Ulrich > [1] http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology
pgpDS40rx2lsP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
