>>>>> On Thu, 2 Jan 2014, Luis Ressel wrote:

> IMHO, this is the best solution proposed so far. It doesn't need a
> new USE flag duplicating information which is already in RESTRICT
> (or am I missing some corner cases here?), and it doesn't bother
> those who don't care about this issue with new distfiles-*/ dirs, as
> with Kent's proposal.

RESTRICT is somewhat complementary to LICENSE and cannot provide as
much information. Especially, RESTRICT="mirror" doesn't say under
what license the restricted pieces are, and doesn't allow for
ACCEPT_LICENSE filtering.

Ulrich

Attachment: pgp8RYngpebjb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to