On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:39:39 -0500 Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > PMS just provides a mechanism, but doesn't prefer one SLOT value > > over another. Such a change would introduce policy into PMS which > > is not the right way to go. > > Sure it does - it defaults to :* when :* was never specified. I don't > see how defaulting to :0= is a "policy" any more than :* is.
SLOT=0 isn't special in PMS these days. (Historically it was. Now SLOT is mandatory, and it doesn't default to 0.) -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
