>>>>> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, Andreas K Huettel wrote: > How about changing this in the next EAPI instead?
> E.g., in EAPI=6, if no slot dependency is given in a dependency > specification, default to :0 PMS just provides a mechanism, but doesn't prefer one SLOT value over another. Such a change would introduce policy into PMS which is not the right way to go. If a dependency on a specific SLOT value is needed then it should be explicitly specified in the ebuild. Ulrich
