El dom, 08-12-2013 a las 18:19 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel escribió:
> Am Sonntag, 8. Dezember 2013, 17:56:12 schrieb Tom Wijsman:
> > 
> > When our defaults force us down such path, that can't be good and it
> > affects the quality of our Portage tree; so, this makes me wonder, can
> > we change the default from :* to :0? What do you think?
> > 
> 
> I see the point, but I have my doubts on retroactively changing things.
> (It's a global change where we would have to be very very very careful 
> regarding interactions with eclasses and so on.)
> 
> How about changing this in the next EAPI instead?
> 
> E.g., in EAPI=6, if no slot dependency is given in a dependency 
> specification, 
> default to :0 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Andreas K. Huettel
> Gentoo Linux developer 
> dilfri...@gentoo.org
> http://www.akhuettel.de/
> 

Other option I have sometimes consider is to force people to specify the
slot dependency on a newer eapi -> if a package is working for any slot,
specify :*, if not, specify the slot that it needs. That way, this kind
of problems would be much less frequent than currently



Reply via email to