On 11/02/2013 07:45 PM, yac wrote:
On Sat, 02 Nov 2013 19:19:21 -0400
"Anthony G. Basile" <bluen...@gentoo.org> wrote:
On 11/02/2013 06:09 PM, yac wrote:
I don't know how this releng stuff works. I bet there is lot of devs
who don't.
This is why you should announce risking commits. Because you may not
know what it will cause, but others will.
If I don't know in the first place, how do I know it's risky?
Afaik there is no official way to update gentoo, is there?
I personally got used to -uaNDv and I don't even know what exactly is
the difference and it's implications between that and just -uD
Adding something to the tree with all keywords set stable is risky. Take
a look at the original commit. I understand why mgorny did it, but it
should have been discussed.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail : bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
