Dnia 2013-08-08, o godz. 17:10:24 Alon Bar-Lev <alo...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Fabio Erculiani <lx...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Moreover, the lvm problem is caused by a very ancient and ill decision > > about doing what upstream tells you to avoid: have mdev in the > > initramfs and udev on the final pivot rooted system. This was just > > looking for troubles but the smarties at the time decided that they > > knew better... And now, tadam, the bug is served... > > People can use genkernel-next, which comes with _proper_ udev support > > (see --udev). > > I won't comment about the entire gnome monolithic windows like, vendor > controlled system that we cooperate with. > > But the above statement is way too much... there should be nothing > wrong in having mdev during boot. initramfs should be simple as > possible and busybox provides this functionality well. The problem is > in udev not in any other component, that probably expects now to run > first and have total control over the boot process. I hope eudev does > not suffer from this. Thanks for your insight. I see you really took a while to do that research and give us the answers we were seeking. Your help improving Gentoo is much appreciated. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
