On Thu, 8 Aug 2013 07:19:39 -0400 Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Tom Wijsman <tom...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 08 Aug 2013 11:29:06 +0200 > > hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> Leave it in ~arch forever, because it is incompatible with system > >> packages. (virtual/service-manager) > > > > But compatible with virtual/service-manager[-prefix,kernel_linux]. > > > > Jokes aside; I'm not aware of any requirement to be compatible with > > this particular package, so I think a blocker would suffice for > > this matter. > > A blocker for what? No idea what incompatibility is being talked about, I wonder about that as well; a dependency as you suggest, can act as a blocker as well, it doesn't literally have to be blocking syntax but just a dependency that would properly act in the same way. Otherwise said, an indirect blocker. We are on the same line here. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : tom...@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
