On 09/01/13 12:29, justin wrote: > On 09/01/13 10:26, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: >> On 09/01/2013 09:40, justin wrote: >>> >>> Also the internals of the build are affected (probably through the >>> difference in configure). This leads to disrespected LDFLAGS and broken >>> tclConfig.sh. So this simple change has deep consequences. >> >> This looks like the _version_ of autoconf used is different. Is the >> output from the same exact system? >> > > Okay, did some more debugging and it seems to be not the new singly > inheriting eclass. > > Repeating the sequential emerge on different FS I get a completely mixed > result. Sometimes both compile are good, sometimes only one and sometime > none. > Could this be a problem with eautoreconf or is this autotools specifc > problem? >
I assume it is a portage problem, because the log says autoconf is run but configure.in didn't change.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
