On 09/01/13 10:26, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 09/01/2013 09:40, justin wrote:
>>
>> Also the internals of the build are affected (probably through the
>> difference in configure). This leads to disrespected LDFLAGS and broken
>> tclConfig.sh. So this simple change has deep consequences.
> 
> This looks like the _version_ of autoconf used is different. Is the
> output from the same exact system?
> 

Okay, did some more debugging and it seems to be not the new singly
inheriting eclass.

Repeating the sequential emerge on different FS I get a completely mixed
result. Sometimes both compile are good, sometimes only one and sometime
none.
Could this be a problem with eautoreconf or is this autotools specifc
problem?

justin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to