On 09/01/13 10:03, Zac Medico wrote: > On 01/09/2013 12:40 AM, justin wrote: >> My question, did anybody else might have observed similar things? Is >> there a flaw in this *ECLASS_ONCE_* stuff? > > There could well be, but even in the absence of the *ECLASS_ONCE_* > stuff, the problem that you're describing could be attributed to eclass > conflicts that cause order of inheritance to make a difference. For > example, it could be that multilib.eclass definitions conflict with one > or more other eclasses, as noted here: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=450988#c1 >
That could be, but in this case it is a matter of the versionator.eclass. This means only global scope variables from that eclass (and I can't find any) would matter and conflict. So I don't think this is the reason.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
