On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:31:07PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Brian Harring <ferri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Either way, I'm honestly not trying to piss folks off here nor stop > > the efforts to dig us out of the python.eclass mess. That said, *this > > time around* that eclass should actually have a plan so that we don't > > wind up in the same cluster fuck scenario as prior. > > > > It's a simple enough request; document your roadmap. Asking for > > reviews w/out that, frankly, is pointless (and sooner or later some > > asswipe like me is going to start -1'ing things till that's > > addressed). > > > > If anyone wants to help in drafting a GLEP, I would appreciate it. > I'll try to start that this week. > > There will definitely be some holes, since I really don't have an all > encompassing plan in my head. But it will be good to fill those in.
Holes in the glep can be sorted/fleshed out; trust me, way more preferable sorting it there then in a live implementation the tree relies upon. :) Thanks- ~harring
