On 30/10/2012 13:04, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > #1 - the MAX_BOOST_VERSION thing isn't needed anymore (and i get the > impression that it actually is, but putting that aside since i don't > maintain any packages that depend on boost), and
It'll just behave like _every other library_ we have in the tree, as Samuli and Alexis already said. And it'll follow the same policy. > #2 - anything requiring boost gets bumped to EAPI5 to get the > slot-operator benefits for rebuilds, I'm not sure if it's strictly needed but it's fine. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
